Capital, fracciones de capital y Estado. Análisis ‘neomarxista’ del Estado sudafricano

Simon Clarke; Edith González Cruz; Panagiotis Doulos

doi:10.32399/ICSYH.bvbuap.2954-4300.2025.6.12.841

Authors

Simon Clarke University of Warwick
Edith González Cruz Instituto de Investigaciones Histórico-Sociales, Universidad Veracruzana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-8349
Panagiotis Doulos Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades “Alfonso Vélez Pliego”, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-5129

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32399/ICSYH.bvbuap.2954-4300.2025.6.12.841

Keywords:

Poulantzas, progressivism, hegemony, overpoliticisation, class struggle

Abstract

This paper examines what has been called the ‘neo-Marxist’ or, more unkindly, the ‘vulgar Poulantzian’, approach to the state. The typical feature of this approach is a formulation of the relation between capital and the state in terms of the struggle between ‘fractions of capital’ to establish the position of ‘hegemonic fraction’ within the ‘power bloc’. The state then represents the unity of capital in relation to the proletariat and the dominance of the hegemonic fraction in relation to the other fractions of capital. Research which is guided by this view of the state tends, therefore, to examine state activity in relation to the policies proposed by various political parties and pressure groups which are said to be the ‘representatives’ of particular fractions of capital. This paper aims to develop a critique of this ‘fractionalist’ approach to the state through a critique of its conceptions of class, of class fractions and of the state. It is argued that the ‘fractionalist’ approach is ‘overpoliticised’ in seeing the state as condensation of the social, at the same time as being ‘economistic’ in directly identifying the state with capital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davies, R. H. (1977). “Capital, The State, and White Wage Earners: An Historical Materialist Analysis of Class Formation and Class Relations in South Africa 1900-1960”. Tesis Doctoral, University of Sussex.

Davies, R.; Kaplan, D.; Morris, M. & O’Meara, D. (1976). “Class struggle and the periodisation of the state in South Africa”. Review of African Political Economy, 3(7), 4-30.

Clarke, S. (1977). “Marxism, sociology and Poulantzas’ theory of the state”. Capital & Class, 1(2), 1-31.

Fransman, M. & Davies, R. (1977). “The South African Social Formation in the Early Capitalist Period Circa 1870-1939: Some Views on the Question of Hegemony”. Adler.

Kaplan, D. E. (1975). The State and Economic Development in South Africa. Mimeografía.

Kaplan, D. E. (1976a). “The politics of industrial protection in South Africa, 1910-1939”. Journal of Southern African Studies, 3(1), 70-91.

Kaplan, D. (1976c). Comments on Innes, 1976. Mimeografía.

Kaplan, D. (1977). “An analysis of the South African state in the Fusion period, 1932-39”. En Collected Seminar Papers. Institute of Commonwealth Studies (vol. 21, 149-159). Institute of Commonwealth Studies.

Legassick, M. (1974a). “South Africa: capital accumulation and violence”. Economy and Society, 3(3), 253-291.

Legassick, M. (1974b). “Legislation, ideology and economy in post 1948 South Africa”. Journal of Southern African Studies, 1(1), 5-35. Morris, M. (1975). “Periodisation, Class Struggle and the State in South Africa”. Mimeografía inédito.

Marx, K. (2007). Elementos fundamentales de la economía política (Grundrisse) 1857-858, vol. I. Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Marx, M. (2009). El capital. Crítica de la economía política, Tomo I, Vol. II. Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Marx, M. (2009). El capital. Crítica de la economía política, Tomo III, Vol. III. Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Poulantzas, N. (1973). Political Power and Social Classes. Sheed and Ward and NLB.

Williams, M. (1975). An analysis of South African Capitalism: Neo-Ricardianism or Marxism? cseb, IV (1).

Wölpe, H. (1972). “Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: From segregation to apartheid”. Economy and Society, 1(4), 425-56.