Society and nature: Dimensions of ecological economics. The meaning of society in history: An essay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32399/ICSYH.bvbuap.2954-4300.2016.17.25.624Keywords:
ecological economics, society and nature, Georgescu-Roegen, complex systemsAbstract
Economics is a discipline of knowledge that studies human relations at work; knowledge of this cultural activity is therefore bound up with the rest of the social sciences within the framework of their history. The arrival of a new, more comprehensive vision of the tasks of economics, thanks to the thought of Georgescu-Roegen in the mid-twentieth century, marks the birth of a very current branch of economic theory called “Ecological Economics.” In the opinion of many scientists, it represents a renewing reconsideration of economic theory: to begin with, it rests on the profound reality of the kinship of human beings with the rest of the elements of nature. On this rests the fundamental premise of Ecological Economics: the basis of the economy is the energy-matter of natural elements transformed by human beings. Another characteristic of Ecological Economics is its insertion into complex-systems thinking and its rejection of the individualist ethic that marks the ideology of neoliberal capitalism. All of the above provides a platform for multiple relations with sociology and the rest of the social sciences.
Downloads
References
Bellamy-Foster, John (2010). The Ecological Rift. New York: Monthly.
Boulding, Kenneth (1966). “The economics of coming spaceship Earth”, en H. Jarret (Ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Boulding, Kenneth (1991). What do we want so sustain? The Science and Managfement of Sustainabililty. New York: Columbia University Press.
Compagnoni, M. (Feb., 200.3). Oikonomia, Rivista de etica e scienze sociali, Roma, Roma Angelicum University Press, 1, 2.
Croccker, Thomas D. (1999). “A short history of environmental and resource economics”. En Jeroen, C. M. Van den Bergh (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham, GL: Edward Elgar Publiching Limited. Daly, Herman y John Cobb (1989). Por el Bien Común (For the Common Good). México: fce.
Domenech, Antoni (1989). De la ética a la política. Barcelona: Crítica.
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.
Maturana, Humberto (1995). “Biology of Self-Consciousness”, en G. Trautteur, Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection. Neapoli: Bibliopolis.
Mirowski, Philip (1989). More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muir, John (1954). The Wilderness World of John Muir. Edited by Edwin Way Teale, Illustrated by Henry B. Kane. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Pesch S.J., Heinrich (1998). On Solidarist Economics: Excerpts from the Lehrbuch Der Nationalökonomie. University Press of America.
Platón (1972). Timeo, tr. de J. A. Miguez. Madrid: Aguilar.
Prigogine, Yllia (1997). El fin de la certidumbre. Madrid: Taurus.
Riffkin, Jeremy (2000). The Access Society. New York: Putman Inc.
Sagoff, M. “The Philosopher as Teacher?”. Metaphilosophy, 11, 307-325.
Sody, W. (1933). Wealth. Virtual Wealth and Debt. New York: Dutton.
Strickland, Jack. Journal of a Tour of the United States of America, Edited by J. E. Strickland, The New York.
Tamayo, M. (1983). Historia universal, vols. 6 y 8. México: Daimon.
Weintraub, E. Roy (1985). General Equilibrium Análisis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
BAJO EL VOLCÁN. REVISTA DEL POSGRADO DE SOCIOLOGÍA. BUAP
